The Plain Record

What things really cost, and why.

Ninety Days With Dates on It: How a Probation Period Is Actually Meant to Run

Posted on by Gordon Achebein Enterprise4 min read

Two hard hats resting on a stack of fresh lumber at the edge of a job site, with long shadows across bare ground
Two hard hats resting on a stack of fresh lumber at the edge of a job site, with long shadows across bare ground

Ask an owner what the probation period on a new hire is for and the answer usually involves being able to let somebody go without difficulty. That is the least useful thing it does, and in most states it does not do it, since employment is generally terminable by either side anyway. What ninety days can be, if somebody puts dates on it, is the only structured chance either party gets to find out whether this arrangement works before both have arranged their lives around it. Managed properly, it ends in a decision rather than a drift.

Week One Belongs to You, Not to Them

The most common failure happens in the first four days, when a new person is handed to whoever is least busy and told to follow along. What that teaches is one crew member's habits, including the shortcuts, and it teaches them without any explanation of which parts are the standard and which are that person's preference. A week of shadowing produces somebody who can imitate the work without understanding why any of it is done that way, which becomes visible the first time they are on a site alone.

The alternative costs a morning. Walk the new person through one complete job from arrival to cleanup, saying out loud why each step happens in that order, and then have them do the next one while you watch and stay quiet unless something is unsafe. Both of those sessions are expensive in the moment and they compress the learning curve by weeks. They also give the owner a genuine baseline, which matters enormously when the day thirty conversation arrives and somebody has to say whether progress has been normal.

The Conversation That Belongs at Day Thirty

Thirty days is early enough that a fixable problem is still a fixable problem and late enough that patterns have appeared. The conversation takes fifteen minutes and covers three things: what is going well, stated specifically rather than warmly, what needs to be different, stated as a behavior rather than an attitude, and what the next thirty days should look like. Vague encouragement at this meeting is the single most expensive kindness in small company management, because it removes the only warning the person was ever going to get.

It also runs the other way, and this is the half owners forget. Asking what has been surprising, what is unclear, and whether anything about the schedule or the pay is not working as described gets answers at thirty days that will not be volunteered at ninety. New people leave over things that could have been solved in a sentence, usually something about hours or drive time that they assumed was permanent and unmentionable. The question costs nothing and it is the cheapest retention available.

The Note Nobody Writes at Day Sixty

Sixty days deserves a written note, and it does not need to be a form. Three or four lines in a notebook or an email to yourself, dated, recording what was discussed and what was agreed, is enough. If the ninety day decision turns out to be a difficult one, that note is the difference between a conversation grounded in a record and a conversation grounded in two conflicting memories. If the decision is easy and positive, the same note becomes the basis for the raise or the change in responsibility that ought to follow.

Three Outcomes, Not Two

The framing everybody carries into this is pass or fail, and the third outcome is the one that actually occurs most often. Somebody who is clearly capable but not yet trusted alone does not need to be kept or released. They need another sixty days with a named skill attached to it, said plainly, with a date. Extending a probation period is not a failure of nerve provided the extension has a specific condition and an end, and it is far better than the common alternative of quietly saying nothing and revisiting the question in a year.

The fourth possibility, rarely discussed, is that the job was described wrongly. A person who is struggling with the paperwork and excellent on the tools may be in the wrong half of a role that should never have been combined. Ninety days is when that becomes visible, and reshaping the position is usually cheaper than replacing the person, particularly for a company hiring its first or second employee and still discovering what it actually needs somebody to do.

What Ninety Managed Days Leave Behind

An owner who runs this properly ends the period with a written record, a person who knows exactly where they stand, and a much clearer description of the job than the one that was advertised. That last item compounds, because the next posting is written from experience rather than from guesswork. The probation period was never really a legal instrument or a safety net. It was the only three months in which both sides were expected to be candid with each other, and the ones who put dates on it get the benefit of that candor for years afterward.

About Gordon Achebe

Gordon writes about what lasts, what does not, and why.

View all posts by Gordon Achebe

About the author

Gordon Achebe

Gordon writes about what lasts, what does not, and why.

More from Gordon Achebe